trust in Freemasonry Archieven

Rider and war horse symbolizing trust and Masonic values of connection

Montaigne on War Horses and Masonic Values

Imagine you are about to step into a difficult conversation, resolve a conflict, or walk an unfamiliar path. You feel resistance, uncertainty, perhaps even fear. It is precisely in moments like these that an unexpected source offers surprisingly practical guidance. In the sixteenth century, Michel de Montaigne wrote a short essay about horses in wartime — seemingly a piece about animals and battlefields. But read closely, and you will find a powerful lesson about connection, trust, and inner growth. These are themes that also stand at the very heart of Freemasonry. What Montaigne Really Wrote About Horses and War In Essay 48 of the first book of his famous Essays, Michel de Montaigne examines the role of the horse in the art of war. He references commanders from antiquity — Julius Caesar, Alexander the Great — and describes how they maintained an extraordinary bond with their mounts. Bucephalus, the legendary horse of Alexander, is presented as the ultimate example of an animal that did not merely obey but truly merged with its rider. Montaigne makes it clear that a horseman’s strength does not reside solely in his own ability, but in his relationship with the horse beneath him. But Montaigne […]

Symbolic representation of trust and brotherhood in Freemasonry

Seneca on True Friendship and Brotherhood in Freemasonry

Have you ever shared a secret with someone you weren’t entirely sure you could trust? Or perhaps you’ve kept someone at arm’s length — someone who actually deserved your full openness? Nearly two thousand years ago, the Stoic philosopher Lucius Annaeus Seneca wrote a short but powerful letter to his friend Lucilius about precisely this dilemma. His reflections on true friendship cut to the heart of what it means to be genuinely connected to another person. And remarkably, they align seamlessly with one of the central values of Freemasonry: brotherhood. Trust Must Come Before Friendship — Not After Seneca opens his third letter with a warning that still resonates today. He argues that you should never trust someone first and only then consider whether they are worthy of that trust. Instead, you must carefully evaluate who you allow into your life — and then give your trust completely. Stopping halfway, Seneca insists, is worse than never beginning at all. This distinction between shallow acquaintances and deep friendships forms the backbone of his argument. For anyone who has ever visited a Masonic lodge, this will sound familiar. Freemasonry has no room for half-hearted bonds. When a candidate is initiated, he enters […]

Stuntman leaping from a platform symbolizing trust and Masonic brotherhood

The Human Catapult: On Daredevils, Trust, and Brotherhood

Picture this: you’re standing on a platform, about to be launched through the air by a human catapult. Below you lies a landing zone. Around you stands a team that has gone over every detail. And yet, things go wrong. A stuntman recently broke his ankle after a jump with a human catapult at a major festival. The news struck me — not just because of the pain involved, but because of the deeper question it raises: what does it truly mean to surrender yourself to a system, to other people, to the unknown? The Leap and the System A stuntman who allows himself to be launched into the air does something most of us would never dare. It’s not just about the physical courage required — it’s about the trust that precedes the leap. A structure has been built. Calculations have been made. People stand ready to catch you. You surrender yourself to a system that is larger than you are. And sometimes, despite every preparation, things go wrong. This isn’t some abstract philosophical puzzle. It’s the reality of everyday life for each one of us. Perhaps not as spectacular as a human catapult, but equally real. Every time […]

Open book with Masonic symbols representing Montaigne and Freemasonry wisdom

Montaigne on Negotiation: Wisdom for Uncertain Hours

Imagine you are about to have a difficult conversation. Perhaps it involves a conflict, a business deal, or a personal matter that has been simmering for too long. You feel the tension, the uncertainty about the outcome, and somewhere beneath it all, the vulnerability of the moment. Michel de Montaigne, the sixteenth-century philosopher celebrated for his deeply personal essays, wrote about precisely these kinds of moments. In his essay ‘That the Hour of Negotiation Is Dangerous,’ he examines why the period of deliberation can be so perilous — and what it demands of our integrity. His insights connect in surprising ways to values that lie at the very heart of Freemasonry. The Vulnerable In-Between In this essay, Montaigne describes how the period of negotiation represents a uniquely dangerous phase. Not because conversations themselves are harmful, but because during this interim the usual rules seem temporarily suspended. Opposing parties come together under a flag of provisional peace. There is no agreement yet, but open hostility has ceased. Within that apparent calm lies the real danger: trust can be exploited, words can be twisted, and anyone who lets down their guard may pay a heavy price. Montaigne draws on historical examples of […]

Ancient fortress commander contemplating a difficult decision at the walls

Montaigne on the Besieged Commander: Courage and Trust

Imagine standing at the head of a fortress, surrounded by enemy troops. The walls are crumbling, supplies are dwindling, and your men look to you for guidance. What do you do? Negotiate? Fight to the bitter end? Seek an honorable way out? In his fifth essay from the first book, Michel de Montaigne examines exactly this dilemma — and in doing so, he offers surprisingly practical wisdom for anyone who has ever faced a difficult choice. The Central Question of the Essay Montaigne opens with a deceptively simple question: is it permissible for the commander of a besieged fortress to negotiate with the besieging enemy? In his era, this was a burning issue. The code of military honor demanded that a commander hold out to the last. But Montaigne, ever the clear-headed thinker, questions whether that rule is truly as absolute as it was claimed to be. At the heart of the essay lies the tension between rigid rules and practical judgment. Montaigne argues that circumstances determine what is fair and wise. A commander who negotiates from a position of weakness acts very differently from one who negotiates from strength and secures favorable terms. It is not the act itself […]